Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
J Physiol Pharmacol ; 73(2)2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2056910

ABSTRACT

Vaccination against COVID-19 is a highly debated subject that brings confusion due to contradictory information coming from the scientific community and the media. Our aim was to focus on a homogeneous group of students in the healthcare field to assess their intention to vaccinate and the drivers behind this decision. A cross-sectional study was performed in the spring of 2021 in a Medical University in Romania. 725 of the undergraduates that completed an online questionnaire regarding their intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 were included in the study. Univariable analysis and logistic regression were performed on several variables to analyze factors affecting the willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19. In our study sample, 93.1% of students presented a strong intention to vaccinate, out of which the highest proportion belonged to subjects studying general medicine (96%). On logistic regression, we identified the following predictor factors: previous infection with coronavirus, prior vaccination refusal, VAX score, scientifically oriented sources of information and preference for RNA-based technology. Medical students have an increased willingness towards vaccination. Even for them, a highly educated and informed group of subjects, the general attitude towards vaccinations has a strong impact on the choice of COVID-19 vaccination.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines , COVID-19 , Haemophilus Vaccines , Influenza Vaccines , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines , SAIDS Vaccines , Students, Medical , Typhoid-Paratyphoid Vaccines , BCG Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diphtheria-Tetanus Vaccine , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine , Hepatitis A Vaccines , Hepatitis B Vaccines , Humans , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , RNA , Romania , Vaccines, Inactivated , Vaccines, Synthetic
2.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 21(12): 1819-1830, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2051000

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Two vaccine formulations are available to prevent diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and poliomyelitis: the pediatric full-dose (DTaP-IPV) and the reduced dose formulation (dTap-IPV). Different immunization schedules are internationally recommended for the pre-school booster dose. AREAS COVERED: International and Italian recommendations, scientific evidence on immunogenicity and safety of DTaP/dTap vaccines to support the full dose as a pre-school booster and Italian vaccination coverage (VC) up to adolescence. EXPERT OPINION: The WHO recommends a '3+1' schedule with DTaP vaccine for primary immunization, followed by a pre-school booster with DTaP or dTap vaccine. In Italy, a '2+1' schedule, with no booster in the second year, and a pre-school booster dose are recommended with DTPa-IPV vaccines. Studies showed a non-inferior immunogenicity in dTap vaccinees in pre-school age; nevertheless, the antibody titers were usually greater in children vaccinated with DTaP, while lower frequencies of adverse events were recorded in children receiving dTap. Italian VCs for pre-school and adolescent boosters have not been satisfactory, which further reduced during the COVID-19 period. In Italy, the pre-school booster offers the last chance to receive a full dose of DTaP vaccine, thus, representing the most suitable intervention to provide lasting protection in children.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines , Haemophilus Vaccines , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Child , Humans , Infant , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated , Immunization, Secondary , Antibodies, Bacterial , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine , Vaccination , Vaccines, Combined
6.
Euro Surveill ; 26(42)2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1485004

ABSTRACT

The incidence of most respiratory-transmitted diseases decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic as a result of containment measures. In contrast, in the Netherlands we noted an increase in invasive disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae b (Hib) (from < 0.3/100,000 before 2019 to 0.39 and 0.33/100,000 in 2020 and 2021) in vaccinated and unvaccinated age groups. We did not find a change in vaccine effectiveness against Hib invasive disease (effectiveness > 90%). We discuss factors that may have contributed to this rise.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Haemophilus Infections , Haemophilus Vaccines , Haemophilus influenzae type b , Haemophilus Infections/epidemiology , Haemophilus Infections/prevention & control , Haemophilus influenzae , Humans , Infant , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 4741, 2021 02 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1104539

ABSTRACT

Clinical studies are ongoing to assess whether existing vaccines may afford protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection through trained immunity. In this exploratory study, we analyze immunization records from 137,037 individuals who received SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests. We find that polio, Haemophilus influenzae type-B (HIB), measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), Varicella, pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13), Geriatric Flu, and hepatitis A/hepatitis B (HepA-HepB) vaccines administered in the past 1, 2, and 5 years are associated with decreased SARS-CoV-2 infection rates, even after adjusting for geographic SARS-CoV-2 incidence and testing rates, demographics, comorbidities, and number of other vaccinations. Furthermore, age, race/ethnicity, and blood group stratified analyses reveal significantly lower SARS-CoV-2 rate among black individuals who have taken the PCV13 vaccine, with relative risk of 0.45 at the 5 year time horizon (n: 653, 95% CI (0.32, 0.64), p-value: 6.9e-05). Overall, this study identifies existing approved vaccines which can be promising candidates for pre-clinical research and Randomized Clinical Trials towards combating COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Haemophilus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunization , Infant , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Male , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Pneumococcal Vaccines/therapeutic use , Poliovirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Protective Factors , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Vaccines, Conjugate/therapeutic use , Viral Hepatitis Vaccines/therapeutic use , Young Adult
8.
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program ; 2020(1): 328-335, 2020 12 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1024352

ABSTRACT

An estimated 1 million people in the United States have functional or anatomic asplenia or hyposplenia. Infectious complications due to encapsulated organisms such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Haemophilus influenzae can lead to fulminant sepsis and death, particularly in young children, in the period shortly after splenectomy, and in immunocompromised patients. Patients with asplenia are also at risk for less common infections due to Capnocytophaga, Babesia, and malaria. Antibiotic prophylaxis, vaccines, and patient and family education are the mainstays of prevention in these at-risk patients. Recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis typically target high-risk periods, such as 1 to 3 years after splenectomy, children ≤5 years of age, or patients with concomitant immunocompromise. However, the risk for sepsis is lifelong, with infections occurring as late as 40 years after splenectomy. Currently available vaccines recommended for patients with asplenia include pneumococcal vaccines (13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine followed by the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine), meningococcal vaccines (meningococcal conjugate vaccines for serogroups A, C, Y and W-135 and serogroup B meningococcal vaccines), H. influenzae type b vaccines, and inactivated influenza vaccines. Ongoing booster doses are also recommended for pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccines to maintain protection. Despite the availability of prevention tools, adherence is often a challenge. Dedicated teams or clinics focused on patient education and monitoring have demonstrated substantial improvements in vaccine coverage rates for individuals with asplenia and reduced risk of infection. Future efforts to monitor the quality of care in patients with asplenia may be important to bridge the know-do gap in this high-risk population.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Infection Control , Infections/etiology , Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases/complications , Spleen/abnormalities , Vaccination , Adult , Bacterial Capsules , Bacterial Infections/chemically induced , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Child , Haemophilus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Humans , Meningococcal Vaccines/therapeutic use , Pneumococcal Vaccines/therapeutic use , Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases/pathology , Spleen/pathology , Splenectomy/adverse effects
9.
Vaccine ; 39(5): 780-785, 2021 01 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-989367

ABSTRACT

Although the direct health impact of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on child health is low, there are indirect impacts across many aspects. We compare childhood vaccine uptake in three types of healthcare facilities in Singapore - public primary care clinics, a hospital paediatric unit, and private paediatrician clinics - from January to April 2020, to baseline, and calculate the impact on herd immunity for measles. We find a 25.6% to 73.6% drop in Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) uptake rates, 0.4 - 10.3% drop for Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis-inactivated Polio-Haemophilus influenza (5-in-1), and 8.0-67.8% drop for Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) across all 3 sites. Consequent herd immunity reduces to 74-84% among 12-month- to 2-year-olds, well below the 95% coverage that is protective for measles. This puts the whole community at risk for a measles epidemic. Public health efforts are urgently needed to maintain efficacious coverage for routine childhood vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Child Health/statistics & numerical data , Public Health/standards , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child, Preschool , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Haemophilus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Humans , Immunity, Herd , Immunization Schedule , Infant , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Singapore/epidemiology
10.
Vaccine ; 39(2): 343-349, 2021 01 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-962223

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has caused a persistent decline in childhood vaccination coverage, including Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine, in some countries. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of decreased Hib vaccination due to COVID-19 on invasive Hib disease burden in Japan. METHODS: Using a deterministic dynamic transmission model (susceptible-carriage-infection-recovery model), the incidence rates of invasive Hib disease in under 5 year olds in rapid vaccination recovery and persistent vaccination declined scenarios were compared for the next 10 years after 2020. The national Hib vaccination rate after the impact of COVID-19 reduced to 87% and 73% in 2020 from approximately 97% each in 2013-2019 for primary and booster doses. RESULTS: While the persistent decline scenarios revealed an increase in invasive Hib disease incidence to 0.50/100,000 children under 5 years old, the incidence of the rapid recovery scenario slightly increased with a consistent decline of incidence after 2021. The shorter the duration of the decline in vaccination rate was, the smaller the incremental disease burden observed in the model. Compared to the rapid recovery scenario, the permanent decline scenario showed a 296.87 cumulative incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALY) loss for the next 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: The persistent decline of Hib vaccination rate due to COVID-19 causes an incremental disease burden irrespective of the possible decline of Hib transmission rate by COVID-19 mitigation measures. A rapid recovery of vaccination coverage rate can prevent this possible incremental disease burden.


Subject(s)
Haemophilus Infections/epidemiology , Haemophilus Infections/prevention & control , Haemophilus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Models, Statistical , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/virology , Child, Preschool , Female , Haemophilus Infections/immunology , Haemophilus Infections/transmission , Haemophilus influenzae type b/drug effects , Haemophilus influenzae type b/immunology , Humans , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Immunization Schedule , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Population Surveillance , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Vaccines, Conjugate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL